Friday, April 27, 2012
Photos of Ron Paul at his Rally in Ft. Worth
These two photos are the best out of several that I took at the Ron Paul Rally in Fort Worth 4-11-12. There were 3,000 people at the Will Rogers Center in Ft. Worth. Some of the profound things that he said that I can remember was "You don't change the world by going to war with people". He said we should tolerate everyones freedom of religion, even be tolerant of atheists. This appealed to me becuase I am an agnostic(note any comments that try to start a religious debate will be deleted. This site promotes freedom of all beliefs). Dr. Paul also said his usual stuff, end the fed, end wars, balance the budget, etc I had a fun time and so did my friend who went with me.We sat 10 rows away from the stage. I dont agree with every one of Dr. Paul's beliefs, I am socially liberal where he is not, but I agree with about 70% about of what he says. He is the best man for the job of presidency. See the whole speech here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clx3YSnzSaY .
Friday, April 13, 2012
News story
I am sure a nude maid service is raising more than just eyebrows!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nude-naked-maid-service-texas-fantasy_n_1417947.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nude-naked-maid-service-texas-fantasy_n_1417947.html
Friday, March 30, 2012
Princess Diana
Diana Princess of Wales truly was a graceful and beloved woman. All throughout the world she was beloved and adored by almost everyone. Then on the night of August 31st 1997 the world was silent as the Princess had been killed in a car accident when the car she was riding in with her boyfriend Dodi Fayed, an egyptian film producer, Henri Paul the driver, and their body guard Trevor Rees-Jones, crashed into a pillar of the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris, France. They were involved in a high speed chase where they were avoiding the paparzzi. The tragic death of one of the world's most beloved people seemed like an open and shut case of a tragic accident. However in the years since numerous bits of evidence have come out to indicate that Diana's death was a conspiracy.
The first piece of evidence that I want to look at is a handwritten letter written by Diana in 1993 where she writes "My husband is planning an accident in my car, brake failure or some serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing more than a decoy so we are being used by the man in every sense oof the word." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-503489/My-husband-planning-accident-car-Dianas-sensational-letter-revealed-full.html . The article also states that Dodi's father Mohammed al Fayed believes his son and Diana were murdered because Diana was pregnant and planning to announce their engagement soon, and Fayed believed that a muslim child would've screwed up the royal bloodline.
Operation Paget was an inquiry team set up by the Metropolitan police to investigate whether there was a conspiracy involved in the Death of the Princess. On Chapter 5 of their official report states that the 14 CCTV cameras in never captured the crash due to them going out. I think the footage has never been found.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/14_12_06_diana_report.pdf
Now multiple sources and tests state that the driver Henri Paul was intoxicated, and his intoxication was responsible for the deaths. Now, when you drive for Royalty or government they check you all the way back to the bed you were concieved in, there are no suprises. So would they allow a man who was drinking to drive the Princess? And If Henri Paul was as intoxicated as they make it sound would Diana and Dodi Fayed gotten into a car he was driving? In this video the comedian Paul Mooney sheds a lot of light on what he believes is an inside job involving Diana's death. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ1J7zRmPnA. He even explains the motive that most people believe that Diana was killed because she was involved with and possibly would've married a muslim and the royal family didnt want that or the kids to be exposed to a muslim culture, etc. So racism
The first piece of evidence that I want to look at is a handwritten letter written by Diana in 1993 where she writes "My husband is planning an accident in my car, brake failure or some serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing more than a decoy so we are being used by the man in every sense oof the word." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-503489/My-husband-planning-accident-car-Dianas-sensational-letter-revealed-full.html . The article also states that Dodi's father Mohammed al Fayed believes his son and Diana were murdered because Diana was pregnant and planning to announce their engagement soon, and Fayed believed that a muslim child would've screwed up the royal bloodline.
Operation Paget was an inquiry team set up by the Metropolitan police to investigate whether there was a conspiracy involved in the Death of the Princess. On Chapter 5 of their official report states that the 14 CCTV cameras in never captured the crash due to them going out. I think the footage has never been found.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/14_12_06_diana_report.pdf
Now multiple sources and tests state that the driver Henri Paul was intoxicated, and his intoxication was responsible for the deaths. Now, when you drive for Royalty or government they check you all the way back to the bed you were concieved in, there are no suprises. So would they allow a man who was drinking to drive the Princess? And If Henri Paul was as intoxicated as they make it sound would Diana and Dodi Fayed gotten into a car he was driving? In this video the comedian Paul Mooney sheds a lot of light on what he believes is an inside job involving Diana's death. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ1J7zRmPnA. He even explains the motive that most people believe that Diana was killed because she was involved with and possibly would've married a muslim and the royal family didnt want that or the kids to be exposed to a muslim culture, etc. So racism
Thursday, March 15, 2012
My issue with The Kindle and Nook
Thanks to our amazing technology in this country we have created devices that you can use to download digital copies of books without having to search far and wide for the actual copy. While this is a huge conveinence to many people, I have noticed that the Kindle and Nook can be detrimental to our future. Due to our technological boom I predict and I hope it doesnt come true, that books will be obsolete in the next generation. Now say 30 years from now, there are hardly any books left in the world, only kindle and nook, and other knockoffs where you can download digital books, well who's to say that in 30 years those devices wont have a chip or program in them that censors books or dissenting parts of books? If there are little to no books left in the future then in theory the makers of Kindle and Nook could alter or censor books that are downloadable, and since there will be no print books, nobody will be able to check to make sure that what is on screen is what is in the book, so nobody would be able to check to disprove censorship.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The Bilderberg Club
Every year the world's elite in banking, royalty, media, politics, business, etc meet once per year at a determined hotel somewhere in the world to discuss matters that are completely secret http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html This group is known as the Bilderberg Group, but chances are you've never heard of it.
The Bilderberg group was created in 1954 when Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands wanted to bring together the elite of Europe and America. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html. They are called bilderberg because the first meeting was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg near Arnhem in the Netherlands, and ever since the group has met in nice hotels around the world. Ususally coming to America every 4 years, they last met in Chantilly, Virginia in 2008. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080605006246&newsLang=en
Now some of you may be wondering what the big deal is? Well The world's elite are meeting in one place and until the past few years it rarely recieved any coverage except from independent news sites and journalists. Many people believe that since what the members discuss is kept secret that some kind of conspiracy about how to control the world and what their plans for controlling world events are. Why else would people like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Rick Perry, Gerald ford, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Prince Charles, and many more members of the world elite be meeting in secret, unless they had something to hide!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants#United_States (The list of memebers have citations to confirm their source) In this video Bill Clinton admits he attended Bilderberg while he was in Europe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jmzWi_nhQg, Rick Perry admits it when he was confronted by an organization called We Are Change, skip to 1:05 to hear the question and his answer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCTgiwWNkgk.
What are these people doing at this conference? You know something is fishy when the world's elite in Banking, media, finance, royalty, politics, and business. You know our US politicians who meet with them violates the Federal Logan Act it is a law which forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. It was passed in 1799 and last amended in 1994. Violation of the Logan Act is a federal felony, punishable under federal law with imprisonment of up to three years. http://law.jrank.org/pages/8357/Logan-Act.html. So if these people arent doing anything wrong, then why the secrecy about what goes on at the meetings? And why until only a few years ago was it just being reported in the mainstream media, when the conference has been meeting since 1954.
Now for an eerie quote from David Rockefeller
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller, "Memoirs" autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405
Some extra material to read about the bilderberg group/conference
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3773019.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bilderberg
The Bilderberg group was created in 1954 when Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands wanted to bring together the elite of Europe and America. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html. They are called bilderberg because the first meeting was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg near Arnhem in the Netherlands, and ever since the group has met in nice hotels around the world. Ususally coming to America every 4 years, they last met in Chantilly, Virginia in 2008. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080605006246&newsLang=en
Now some of you may be wondering what the big deal is? Well The world's elite are meeting in one place and until the past few years it rarely recieved any coverage except from independent news sites and journalists. Many people believe that since what the members discuss is kept secret that some kind of conspiracy about how to control the world and what their plans for controlling world events are. Why else would people like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Rick Perry, Gerald ford, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Prince Charles, and many more members of the world elite be meeting in secret, unless they had something to hide!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants#United_States (The list of memebers have citations to confirm their source) In this video Bill Clinton admits he attended Bilderberg while he was in Europe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jmzWi_nhQg, Rick Perry admits it when he was confronted by an organization called We Are Change, skip to 1:05 to hear the question and his answer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCTgiwWNkgk.
What are these people doing at this conference? You know something is fishy when the world's elite in Banking, media, finance, royalty, politics, and business. You know our US politicians who meet with them violates the Federal Logan Act it is a law which forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. It was passed in 1799 and last amended in 1994. Violation of the Logan Act is a federal felony, punishable under federal law with imprisonment of up to three years. http://law.jrank.org/pages/8357/Logan-Act.html. So if these people arent doing anything wrong, then why the secrecy about what goes on at the meetings? And why until only a few years ago was it just being reported in the mainstream media, when the conference has been meeting since 1954.
Now for an eerie quote from David Rockefeller
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller, "Memoirs" autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405
Some extra material to read about the bilderberg group/conference
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3773019.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bilderberg
Friday, February 17, 2012
Voting
We often hear that the majority of people in this country are independent voters and that the majority of people in this country are dissatisfied with congress and the president. Well you know what they sure dont vote that way! Look at this poll by Gallup, the approval rating for congress(look at the 3rd table) it shows that the approval rating for congress is barely in the double digits!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/1600/Congress-Public.aspx, another poll shows that congress has a disaproval rating in the 80% range
People always claim that we need a strong 3rd party candidate and that the majority of people are independent voters. According to this gallup poll the majority of people are independent. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx. YET THEY DONT VOTE THAT WAY! Everyone needs to get out there and vote! Thats why third party candidates don't do well is because almost everyone who votes believes that they can either vote for a democrat or a republican! People you have more options! If you are dissatisfied with both parties then vote for someone else, it doesnt matter what party they belong to vote for the ideas of the individual instead of the party they belong to. VOTING IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A HORSE RACE, you are NOT supposed to vote for who everyone believes is going to win, or who the candidate who always gets the most airtime. You have to vote your heart and conscience! And do not ever let anyone tell you that you have wasted your vote, if you dont vote heart and conscience then YOU HAVE WASTED YOUR VOTE!! Remember Jesse Ventura(my idol) and Angus King, won the governorship on wasted votes and they were the independent candidates!
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Allow me to quote Jerry Garcia from the band Grateful Dead; "choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)