Every year the world's elite in banking, royalty, media, politics, business, etc meet once per year at a determined hotel somewhere in the world to discuss matters that are completely secret http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html This group is known as the Bilderberg Group, but chances are you've never heard of it.
The Bilderberg group was created in 1954 when Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands wanted to bring together the elite of Europe and America. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html. They are called bilderberg because the first meeting was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg near Arnhem in the Netherlands, and ever since the group has met in nice hotels around the world. Ususally coming to America every 4 years, they last met in Chantilly, Virginia in 2008. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080605006246&newsLang=en
Now some of you may be wondering what the big deal is? Well The world's elite are meeting in one place and until the past few years it rarely recieved any coverage except from independent news sites and journalists. Many people believe that since what the members discuss is kept secret that some kind of conspiracy about how to control the world and what their plans for controlling world events are. Why else would people like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Rick Perry, Gerald ford, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Prince Charles, and many more members of the world elite be meeting in secret, unless they had something to hide!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants#United_States (The list of memebers have citations to confirm their source) In this video Bill Clinton admits he attended Bilderberg while he was in Europe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jmzWi_nhQg, Rick Perry admits it when he was confronted by an organization called We Are Change, skip to 1:05 to hear the question and his answer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCTgiwWNkgk.
What are these people doing at this conference? You know something is fishy when the world's elite in Banking, media, finance, royalty, politics, and business. You know our US politicians who meet with them violates the Federal Logan Act it is a law which forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. It was passed in 1799 and last amended in 1994. Violation of the Logan Act is a federal felony, punishable under federal law with imprisonment of up to three years. http://law.jrank.org/pages/8357/Logan-Act.html. So if these people arent doing anything wrong, then why the secrecy about what goes on at the meetings? And why until only a few years ago was it just being reported in the mainstream media, when the conference has been meeting since 1954.
Now for an eerie quote from David Rockefeller
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller, "Memoirs" autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405
Some extra material to read about the bilderberg group/conference
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3773019.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bilderberg
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Friday, February 17, 2012
Voting
We often hear that the majority of people in this country are independent voters and that the majority of people in this country are dissatisfied with congress and the president. Well you know what they sure dont vote that way! Look at this poll by Gallup, the approval rating for congress(look at the 3rd table) it shows that the approval rating for congress is barely in the double digits!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/1600/Congress-Public.aspx, another poll shows that congress has a disaproval rating in the 80% range
People always claim that we need a strong 3rd party candidate and that the majority of people are independent voters. According to this gallup poll the majority of people are independent. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx. YET THEY DONT VOTE THAT WAY! Everyone needs to get out there and vote! Thats why third party candidates don't do well is because almost everyone who votes believes that they can either vote for a democrat or a republican! People you have more options! If you are dissatisfied with both parties then vote for someone else, it doesnt matter what party they belong to vote for the ideas of the individual instead of the party they belong to. VOTING IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A HORSE RACE, you are NOT supposed to vote for who everyone believes is going to win, or who the candidate who always gets the most airtime. You have to vote your heart and conscience! And do not ever let anyone tell you that you have wasted your vote, if you dont vote heart and conscience then YOU HAVE WASTED YOUR VOTE!! Remember Jesse Ventura(my idol) and Angus King, won the governorship on wasted votes and they were the independent candidates!
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Allow me to quote Jerry Garcia from the band Grateful Dead; "choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil".
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Quote
An eerie quote from Adam Weishaupt the founder of the Illuminati.
"The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is better than the three lower degrees of Free Masonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Free Masonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands. By establishing reading societies, and subscription libraries, and taking these under our direction, and supplying them through our labours, we may turn the public mind which way we will."-Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati in John Robison's Proofs of a Conspiracy, 1793
"The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is better than the three lower degrees of Free Masonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Free Masonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands. By establishing reading societies, and subscription libraries, and taking these under our direction, and supplying them through our labours, we may turn the public mind which way we will."-Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati in John Robison's Proofs of a Conspiracy, 1793
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Are the Democratic and Republican parties the same thing?
Are the Democratic and Republican parties different manifestations of the same thing? I believe they are. Let's play a game, make a derogatory comment about republicans, say for instance that they're fascists. Then make a similar derogatory comment about democrats, say for instance that they're socialists.
Lets try another set of examples (Author's note: I have a point and I am getting to it) Lets say Republicans are war mongerers, and that democrats claim that they go to war for "humanitarian intervention". Try thinking of more examples yourself. So with all these derogatory comments one should realize that these things are sort of the same thing, but with different names. Socialism and fascism are sort of the same thing, same as saying that republicans are war mongerers and that democrats use humanitarian intervention as an excuse to go to war. War is still war no matter what.
Trust me if these parties were so against each other then why do they compromise so much? Michelle Bachmann claims she is against Obamacare but yet when you look at the roll call for the final vote you'll see that Bachmann voted for it. It passed the house unanimously there were no "nays" from anyone. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll768.xml . Hell even Ron Paul, who I support even voted for it, but for reasons I have yet to determine, but I am sure he had a good reason. But in the debates both he and Bachmann have voiced opposition for it. This is just one example there are plenty more. See I think a lot of politics is like pro wrestling, on the screen when the cameras are rolling they pretend that they hate each other, but I'm sure the harsh reality is that behind closed doors a lot of these people are friends and make deals with each other and work together, etc.
Lastly watch this video by filmmaker and radio show host Alex Jones where he explains the false left-right paradigm and how both parties prop each other up with controversey placed on both sides while being controlled by the same powers and interest groups behind the scenes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTahZE4q90U .
Lets try another set of examples (Author's note: I have a point and I am getting to it) Lets say Republicans are war mongerers, and that democrats claim that they go to war for "humanitarian intervention". Try thinking of more examples yourself. So with all these derogatory comments one should realize that these things are sort of the same thing, but with different names. Socialism and fascism are sort of the same thing, same as saying that republicans are war mongerers and that democrats use humanitarian intervention as an excuse to go to war. War is still war no matter what.
Trust me if these parties were so against each other then why do they compromise so much? Michelle Bachmann claims she is against Obamacare but yet when you look at the roll call for the final vote you'll see that Bachmann voted for it. It passed the house unanimously there were no "nays" from anyone. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll768.xml . Hell even Ron Paul, who I support even voted for it, but for reasons I have yet to determine, but I am sure he had a good reason. But in the debates both he and Bachmann have voiced opposition for it. This is just one example there are plenty more. See I think a lot of politics is like pro wrestling, on the screen when the cameras are rolling they pretend that they hate each other, but I'm sure the harsh reality is that behind closed doors a lot of these people are friends and make deals with each other and work together, etc.
Lastly watch this video by filmmaker and radio show host Alex Jones where he explains the false left-right paradigm and how both parties prop each other up with controversey placed on both sides while being controlled by the same powers and interest groups behind the scenes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTahZE4q90U .
Friday, February 3, 2012
Martial Law
Martial law is a very serious threat to the liberties of the American people, because it will allow indefinite detention of Americans without trial and they can be thrown into labor camps or prison camps, etc. The first document I want to look at is called the Civilian Inmate Labor Program which provides policy for creating labor camps and prison camps on army installations. http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/R210_35.PDF
The next thing I want to look at is called REX 84, or Readiness Emergency Exercise 84 which was a drill developed by the US to suspend the constitution and place the military in charge of state and local governments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84 . The author of the plan Oliver North was questioned about it in the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987. When North was aked about the plan by Congressman Jack Brooks, North's lawyer says that the matter is irrelavant and that they could make arrangments to discuss it in an executive session. (Skip to :50to see the clip of the hearing) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ .
The next bill I want to show you is called H.R. 5122 A.K.A the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. This bill allowed the president to declare martial law and take control of the National Guard without state governor authorization when the state cannot enforce the law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Warner_Defense_Authorization_Act
Now for the text of the bill,Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy." Click to see a PDF of the bill. Type sec.1076(exactly like that) into the search bar and hit enter, when it pulls up the table of contents hit enter again or go to pg. 322. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:h5122enr.txt.pdf
The definition of insurrection is "Revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government". http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insurrection
So if enough people resist a government then martial law can be declared by the president without approval of a the state governor.
The next thing I want to look at is called REX 84, or Readiness Emergency Exercise 84 which was a drill developed by the US to suspend the constitution and place the military in charge of state and local governments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84 . The author of the plan Oliver North was questioned about it in the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987. When North was aked about the plan by Congressman Jack Brooks, North's lawyer says that the matter is irrelavant and that they could make arrangments to discuss it in an executive session. (Skip to :50to see the clip of the hearing) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ .
The next bill I want to show you is called H.R. 5122 A.K.A the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. This bill allowed the president to declare martial law and take control of the National Guard without state governor authorization when the state cannot enforce the law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Warner_Defense_Authorization_Act
Now for the text of the bill,Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy." Click to see a PDF of the bill. Type sec.1076(exactly like that) into the search bar and hit enter, when it pulls up the table of contents hit enter again or go to pg. 322. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:h5122enr.txt.pdf
The definition of insurrection is "Revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government". http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insurrection
So if enough people resist a government then martial law can be declared by the president without approval of a the state governor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)