Every year the world's elite in banking, royalty, media, politics, business, etc meet once per year at a determined hotel somewhere in the world to discuss matters that are completely secret http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html This group is known as the Bilderberg Group, but chances are you've never heard of it.
The Bilderberg group was created in 1954 when Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands wanted to bring together the elite of Europe and America. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2076789-1,00.html. They are called bilderberg because the first meeting was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg near Arnhem in the Netherlands, and ever since the group has met in nice hotels around the world. Ususally coming to America every 4 years, they last met in Chantilly, Virginia in 2008. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080605006246&newsLang=en
Now some of you may be wondering what the big deal is? Well The world's elite are meeting in one place and until the past few years it rarely recieved any coverage except from independent news sites and journalists. Many people believe that since what the members discuss is kept secret that some kind of conspiracy about how to control the world and what their plans for controlling world events are. Why else would people like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Rick Perry, Gerald ford, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Prince Charles, and many more members of the world elite be meeting in secret, unless they had something to hide!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants#United_States (The list of memebers have citations to confirm their source) In this video Bill Clinton admits he attended Bilderberg while he was in Europe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jmzWi_nhQg, Rick Perry admits it when he was confronted by an organization called We Are Change, skip to 1:05 to hear the question and his answer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCTgiwWNkgk.
What are these people doing at this conference? You know something is fishy when the world's elite in Banking, media, finance, royalty, politics, and business. You know our US politicians who meet with them violates the Federal Logan Act it is a law which forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. It was passed in 1799 and last amended in 1994. Violation of the Logan Act is a federal felony, punishable under federal law with imprisonment of up to three years. http://law.jrank.org/pages/8357/Logan-Act.html. So if these people arent doing anything wrong, then why the secrecy about what goes on at the meetings? And why until only a few years ago was it just being reported in the mainstream media, when the conference has been meeting since 1954.
Now for an eerie quote from David Rockefeller
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller, "Memoirs" autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405
Some extra material to read about the bilderberg group/conference
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3773019.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bilderberg
Showing posts with label republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label republicans. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Friday, February 17, 2012
Voting
We often hear that the majority of people in this country are independent voters and that the majority of people in this country are dissatisfied with congress and the president. Well you know what they sure dont vote that way! Look at this poll by Gallup, the approval rating for congress(look at the 3rd table) it shows that the approval rating for congress is barely in the double digits!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/1600/Congress-Public.aspx, another poll shows that congress has a disaproval rating in the 80% range
People always claim that we need a strong 3rd party candidate and that the majority of people are independent voters. According to this gallup poll the majority of people are independent. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx. YET THEY DONT VOTE THAT WAY! Everyone needs to get out there and vote! Thats why third party candidates don't do well is because almost everyone who votes believes that they can either vote for a democrat or a republican! People you have more options! If you are dissatisfied with both parties then vote for someone else, it doesnt matter what party they belong to vote for the ideas of the individual instead of the party they belong to. VOTING IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A HORSE RACE, you are NOT supposed to vote for who everyone believes is going to win, or who the candidate who always gets the most airtime. You have to vote your heart and conscience! And do not ever let anyone tell you that you have wasted your vote, if you dont vote heart and conscience then YOU HAVE WASTED YOUR VOTE!! Remember Jesse Ventura(my idol) and Angus King, won the governorship on wasted votes and they were the independent candidates!
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Independent and third party candidates can win but they dont because people believe that their vote wont count or that they have to pick the winner because we want to be associated with winners. If you are tired of the two parties then vote for someone else no matter what party, even if it's the "rent is too damn high" party! Lastly I want to point out this fact. Abraham Lincoln was the third party candidate! In 1854 the modern day Republican party formed out of the Whig party. Fast forward to 1860 the Republican party only had a little representation in congress and wasnt condsiderd a major party until Abraham Lincoln won on the ticket, and during the election the Democratic party split into the democratic and the southern democratic party, and the Constitutional Union Party. So it was a four-way race, and Abe Lincoln won on the republican ticket, which at the time was considered a minor third party.
Obama's approval rating is at 46% http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx but people dont show how much they dissaprove when they vote.
Allow me to quote Jerry Garcia from the band Grateful Dead; "choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil".
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Are the Democratic and Republican parties the same thing?
Are the Democratic and Republican parties different manifestations of the same thing? I believe they are. Let's play a game, make a derogatory comment about republicans, say for instance that they're fascists. Then make a similar derogatory comment about democrats, say for instance that they're socialists.
Lets try another set of examples (Author's note: I have a point and I am getting to it) Lets say Republicans are war mongerers, and that democrats claim that they go to war for "humanitarian intervention". Try thinking of more examples yourself. So with all these derogatory comments one should realize that these things are sort of the same thing, but with different names. Socialism and fascism are sort of the same thing, same as saying that republicans are war mongerers and that democrats use humanitarian intervention as an excuse to go to war. War is still war no matter what.
Trust me if these parties were so against each other then why do they compromise so much? Michelle Bachmann claims she is against Obamacare but yet when you look at the roll call for the final vote you'll see that Bachmann voted for it. It passed the house unanimously there were no "nays" from anyone. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll768.xml . Hell even Ron Paul, who I support even voted for it, but for reasons I have yet to determine, but I am sure he had a good reason. But in the debates both he and Bachmann have voiced opposition for it. This is just one example there are plenty more. See I think a lot of politics is like pro wrestling, on the screen when the cameras are rolling they pretend that they hate each other, but I'm sure the harsh reality is that behind closed doors a lot of these people are friends and make deals with each other and work together, etc.
Lastly watch this video by filmmaker and radio show host Alex Jones where he explains the false left-right paradigm and how both parties prop each other up with controversey placed on both sides while being controlled by the same powers and interest groups behind the scenes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTahZE4q90U .
Lets try another set of examples (Author's note: I have a point and I am getting to it) Lets say Republicans are war mongerers, and that democrats claim that they go to war for "humanitarian intervention". Try thinking of more examples yourself. So with all these derogatory comments one should realize that these things are sort of the same thing, but with different names. Socialism and fascism are sort of the same thing, same as saying that republicans are war mongerers and that democrats use humanitarian intervention as an excuse to go to war. War is still war no matter what.
Trust me if these parties were so against each other then why do they compromise so much? Michelle Bachmann claims she is against Obamacare but yet when you look at the roll call for the final vote you'll see that Bachmann voted for it. It passed the house unanimously there were no "nays" from anyone. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll768.xml . Hell even Ron Paul, who I support even voted for it, but for reasons I have yet to determine, but I am sure he had a good reason. But in the debates both he and Bachmann have voiced opposition for it. This is just one example there are plenty more. See I think a lot of politics is like pro wrestling, on the screen when the cameras are rolling they pretend that they hate each other, but I'm sure the harsh reality is that behind closed doors a lot of these people are friends and make deals with each other and work together, etc.
Lastly watch this video by filmmaker and radio show host Alex Jones where he explains the false left-right paradigm and how both parties prop each other up with controversey placed on both sides while being controlled by the same powers and interest groups behind the scenes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTahZE4q90U .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)